February 2023 Class Action Blog Summary
What are the most significant judicial decisions affecting class action litigation, and how might they impact your business?
Our attorneys tackle these questions, and more, in our blog, Consumer Financial Services Law Monitor. The following overview provides summaries of our most recent posts, which include case summaries, key takeaways, and practical insights affecting class action litigation.
Do you have a question or comment about the information presented in our posts? Please contact Scott Kelly and Mary Zinsner, partners in our financial services litigation practice.
About Our Class Action Practice
Troutman Pepper's national class action litigation team defends bet-the-company class actions across the U.S. We have successfully defended class actions in more than 35 states, including California, Florida, Illinois, and West Virginia.
We have a long track record of resolving class actions for clients in diverse industries and affecting a wide range of legal and business concerns. Our team includes attorneys whose practices are dedicated to sectors such as financial services, insurance, hospitals and health care, pharmaceuticals and medical devices, retail, higher education, and more. We offer a deep bench of experienced attorneys in areas such as debt collection practices, data breach, privacy, products liability, securities, mass tort, unfair business practices, labor and employment, environmental, ERISA, and antitrust.
Featured Posts
New York Federal Court Grants Summary Judgment in FDCPA Letter Case Due to Absence of Standing
In Snyder v. LVNV Funding LLC, et al.,
the plaintiff filed a putative class action lawsuit against LVNV Funding LLC (LVNV) and Sequium Asset Solutions, LLC (SAS), alleging a letter from SAS offering a settlement of her debt violated sections 1692e(2)(A) and 1692g(a)(1)
of the Federal Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). The court held that the plaintiff could not establish a concrete injury and granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment.
Read More
No More Confusion: New York Federal Court Finds Communications Between Attorneys Are Not Actionable Under the FDCPA
After lengthy discovery and litigation, a U.S. district court judge in the Western District
of New York ended a class action lawsuit by holding that communications between attorneys are not actionable under the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA).
Read More
Illinois Supreme Court Rules BIPA Claims Accrue With Each Scan
Q: Does a BIPA claim accrue each time a person’s biometrics are scanned or only with the first such scan?
A: A BIPA claim accrues with each scan.
Read More