Speaking Engagements
Healthcare Securities Class Actions, SEC Enforcement & Emerging Capital Markets Risks
September 2, 2026
On September 12, 2024, the U.S. Department of Commerce’s Bureau of Industry and Security (“BIS”) issued a final rule that requires reporting entities to make significant changes to Voluntary Self-Disclosures (“VSD”); the BIS also updated its penalty guidelines. These updates align with BIS’s broader agenda to modernize enforcement mechanisms and increase transparency for businesses navigating export control regulations. BIS concurrently appointed its first-ever Chief of Corporate Enforcement, who will serve as the primary interface between BIS’s special agents, the Department of Commerce’s Office of Chief Counsel for BIS, and the Department of Justice with the goal to coordinate significant corporate investigations, further reflecting BIS’s commitment to hold export violators accountable.
Revised Voluntary Self-Disclosure Process
The VSD process has long served as a mechanism for businesses to self-report potential violations of the Export Administration Regulations (“EAR”). BIS incentivizes voluntary disclosure with the potential for reduced penalties and mitigated enforcement actions. However, the new updates to § 764.5 of the EAR introduce refinements aimed at streamlining the disclosure process and encouraging timelier self-reporting.
Key changes include:
Enhanced Penalty Guidelines
The penalty guidelines accompanying VSDs have also been modified, reflecting a shift in how BIS will assess and impose penalties for violations of the EAR. The updated guidelines under Supplement No. 1 to Part 766 of the EAR aim to introduce more structured penalty assessments, providing greater predictability while imposing more stringent consequences for willful or egregious violations.
Key updates include:
Implications for Compliance Programs
These updates trigger the need to update international trade compliance programs, particularly those dealing with export controls. Companies should:
What Lies Ahead
These updates represent BIS’s efforts to modernize and step-up its enforcement to encourage greater industry-wide compliance. Companies should assess their compliance programs to avoid being the target of BIS enforcement. The clearer guidelines offer both opportunities for penalty mitigation through voluntary disclosure and the potential for more severe penalties in cases of non-compliance.
We see significant areas for improvement in training – many companies have employees who are unaware of BIS licensing requirements, and even more cases where goods and technology are misclassified resulting in unlicensed shipments of restricted materials.
For companies navigating the regulatory landscape, staying informed about these changes and integrating them into internal policies will be critical. With enforcement becoming more streamlined and transparent, the margin for error is shrinking, but so too is the uncertainty surrounding penalty assessments.
Conclusion
This paper is intended as a guide only and is not a substitute for specific legal or tax advice. Please reach out to the authors for any specific questions. We expect to continue to monitor the topics addressed in this paper and provide future client updates when useful.
This just in
Speaking Engagements
Healthcare Securities Class Actions, SEC Enforcement & Emerging Capital Markets Risks
September 2, 2026
Speaking Engagements
PFAS for Decision Makers: Managing PFAS Risk in Today’s Deals – While Preparing for What’s Next
August 27, 2026 | 12:00 PM – 1:00 PM CT
Webinar
Firm Events
Cocktails and Networking During MEDevice Boston
August 26, 2026 | 6:00 PM – 8:00 PM ET
Lifted Restaurant
450 Summer St, Boston, MA 02210
Speaking Engagements
The 2026 Multifamily Maturity Cliff: Reading the $162 Billion Refinancing Wave and the Engagements It Will Generate
August 26, 2026 | 1:00 PM – 3:10 PM ET
Webinar