Speaking Engagements
Healthcare Securities Class Actions, SEC Enforcement & Emerging Capital Markets Risks
September 2, 2026
This article briefly explains the key issues of contract rejection in a bankruptcy case.
In every bankruptcy case, a bankrupt debtor (or trustee in certain cases) must address its existing executory contracts and unexpired leases. An executory contract is a contract under which both sides have material ongoing obligations. Put another way, an executory contract is a contract where if either side stopped performing, it would be a breach of the contract. If a debtor no longer wishes to receive the benefits of or the burdens associated with an executory contract or unexpired lease, Section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code permits the debtor to reject such agreement.
Rejection of an agreement under the Bankruptcy Code does not terminate the agreement. Rather, rejection is treated as a breach of the contract, and any damage claim arising from that breach is treated as if it arose immediately before the bankruptcy was filed.
A debtor may reject an executory contract or unexpired lease by motion or operation of a chapter 11 plan. In larger bankruptcy cases, rejection notices often contain schedules listing numerous contracts to be rejected in a single pleading.
A contract counterparty must continue to perform its obligations under an executory contract or unexpired lease while the debtor determines whether to assume or reject the agreement. Where continued performance would result in material inequity or harm to the non-debtor party (for example, where the party will have to incur substantial costs to perform, without knowing whether the debtor ultimately will reject the contract), parties may file a motion asking the Bankruptcy Court to compel the debtor to make an early decision on assumption or rejection. The court has considerable discretion on such a motion, but will not grant such relief if the harm to the debtor would outweigh the harm to the other party.
A debtor cannot cherry-pick which portions of an agreement it wishes to reject. The debtor must assume or reject the agreement in its entirety. Nuanced exceptions to this general rule may apply to certain kinds of contracts, such as master leases to which schedules are added from time to time.
The Bankruptcy Code dictates when certain contracts will be rejected if none are earlier assumed:
Counterparties to certain kinds of contracts, such as leases under which the debtor is a landlord and license agreements under which the debtor is a licensor of intellectual property, enjoy special rights upon rejection. Subject to certain limitations, a tenant whose lease is rejected by a debtor may retain certain rights that do not require action by the debtor, including the right to remain in possession, and the licensee under a rejected IP license agreement may retain certain IP rights. As with most issues involving the bankruptcy code, the availability of those special rights, and the desirability of exercising them given the associated limitations, will depend on the facts and circumstances of each case.
Upon rejection of its agreement, a contract counterparty should file a claim in the bankruptcy case asserting damages arising from the debtor’s breach of the contract. There will often be a fairly short deadline to file that claim. Unless the contracting party holds a perfected lien on collateral to secure any damage claim, a claim on account of a rejected agreement is treated as a general unsecured claim. Counterparties who lease real property to the debtor may also assert lease rejection damages, the value for which is determined and capped by a specific formula outlined in the Bankruptcy Code. Amounts due and owing under the contract between the date when the bankruptcy was filed, and the rejection date may qualify as an administrative expense claim.
Contract counterparties must act quickly to discern and preserve their rights in bankruptcy. Competent counsel should be retained to ensure the contract counterparty places itself in the best position for optimal recovery.
Access this article and read other insights from our Creditor’s Rights Toolkit.
Resources
This just in
Speaking Engagements
Healthcare Securities Class Actions, SEC Enforcement & Emerging Capital Markets Risks
September 2, 2026
Speaking Engagements
PFAS for Decision Makers: Managing PFAS Risk in Today’s Deals – While Preparing for What’s Next
August 27, 2026 | 12:00 PM – 1:00 PM CT
Webinar
Firm Events
Cocktails and Networking During MEDevice Boston
August 26, 2026 | 6:00 PM – 8:00 PM ET
Lifted Restaurant
450 Summer St, Boston, MA 02210
Speaking Engagements
The 2026 Multifamily Maturity Cliff: Reading the $162 Billion Refinancing Wave and the Engagements It Will Generate
August 26, 2026 | 1:00 PM – 3:10 PM ET
Webinar