Bryan G. Harrison

Bryan is a lead trial attorney focusing on intellectual property, trade compliance, and competition law disputes, and the proactive counseling of clients in these areas.

A former trial attorney in the Antitrust Division of the U.S. Department of Justice, Bryan serves as regional and national trial counsel for clients in courts across more than 30 states, as well as in Canada and the EU, and appears before administrative bodies, including the International Trade Commission. He represents clients ranging from emerging companies to global manufacturers in patent enforcement and defense, navigating U.S. and international trade regulations, and competition. Clients value Bryan’s talent for making complex issues understandable to judges and juries and pragmatic approach, honed through extensive experience in high-stakes IP and competition litigation.

• In the Matter of Certain Pre-Stretched Synthetic Braiding Hair and Packaging Therefor, Inv. No. 337-TA-1415 (U.S.I.T.C.). Post-final determination counsel challenging applicability of limited exclusion order and cease-and-desist order to a respondent’s re-designed products through 19 C.F.R. §177.1 proceeding (pending).
• First Biotech, Inc., et al., v. Newest Biotech, Inc. (C.D. Cal.). Lead counsel for plaintiffs in trademark infringement and unfair competition action (pending).
• Slice Ins. Techs., Inc. v. Appalachian Underwriters, Inc. (S.D.N.Y.). Lead counsel for plaintiff in unfair competition and breach of license agreement action against former licensee (pending).
• HTMX Indus., LLC, et al. v. United States, et al. (C.I.T.). Lead counsel for four plaintiffs in consolidated action challenging List 3A and four tariffs (pending).
• PacSec3 LLC v. Alibaba.com LLC, et al. (S.D.N.Y. and N.D. Cal.). Lead counsel for defendants in a patent infringement action; obtained dismissal with prejudice of all asserted claims after transfer prior to filing answer.
• Everlight Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Walmart Inc. (W.D. Tex.). Lead counsel for plaintiff in patent infringement action. Obtained settlement after issuance of Markman
• In the Matter of Certain Dryer Wall Exhaust Vent Assemblies and Components Thereof; Inv. No. 337-TA-3800 (U.S.I.T.C.). Lead counsel for complainant manufacturer in an ITC investigation concerning exterior wall dryer exhaust vents. Obtained Commission opinion finding patent infringement including issuance of limited exclusion and cease and desist orders.
• Nine Stars Group (U.S.A.), Inc. v. Factory Direct Wholesale, LLC (C.D. Cal.). Lead counsel for defendant in a patent infringement action; obtained summary judgment of invalidity of all asserted claims.
• In the Matter of Certain Raised Garden Beds and Components Thereof (U.S.I.T.C. and S.D. Tex.). Lead counsel for startup complainant in an ITC investigation and district court litigation concerning raised metal garden beds. Completed one-week trial and obtained Commission decision finding the misappropriation of trade secrets, including issuance of limited exclusion and cease and desist orders; filed subsequent enforcement proceeding (obtained settlement).
• In the Matter of Certain Ground Fault Circuit Interrupters and Devices Containing Same (U.S.I.T.C. and D.N.M.). Lead counsel for respondent manufacturer in an ITC investigation and related district court litigation concerning ground fault circuit interrupters. Completed two-week ITC trial, obtaining the final Commission order and a district court summary judgment of noninfringement.
• In the Matter of Certain Toner Cartridges and Devices Containing Same (U.S.I.T.C.). Represented the nonrespondent manufacturers impacted by a general exclusion order seeking clearance opinions from the Office of International Trade; received full clearance on all products.
• Defended U.S. subsidiary and foreign affiliates against BIS and OFAC claims of violations of export controls; obtained administrative rulings of no violation.
• Profectus Tech. LLC v. Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd., et al., (E.D. Tex). Represented defendant group in a patent infringement action relating to adjustment/activation of a computer screen in response to an external event; obtained summary judgment of non-infringement, affirmed on appeal to Fed. Cir.
• Logica UK Ltd. v. CES Int’l, Inc. (U.K.). Represented defendant in a copyright and software performance dispute before the High Court of Justice, Queens Bench Division, Technology and Construction Court in London, England. Granted leave by the court to appear as co-counsel in front of the bar; obtained settlement.
• All-Media Typlan Ltd. v. Reuters Am., Inc., et al. (S.D.N.Y. and various courts throughout Europe). Lead counsel for a plaintiff software developer in a copyright infringement and Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act case; coordinating and appearing in actions pending in New York, the Netherlands, United Kingdom, and Switzerland, appearing in front of the bar in Switzerland during trial.

• Best Lawyers in America®, Litigation – Intellectual Property (2024-2026)
• Super Lawyers® Georgia, Intellectual Property Litigation (2004-2019)
• Chambers USA, Award for Excellence, Intellectual Property Litigation (2010-2014)