Frank is a registered patent attorney who represents companies across various industries, primarily counseling clients in patent litigation and related matters. He helps clients develop effective patent litigation strategies to achieve their goals.
Frank handles all aspects of patent litigation, including pre-suit diligence, claim construction, expert discovery, and trial. He has particular experience in handling patent litigation matters before the United States International Trade Commission (ITC). Frank also handles inter partes review (IPR), particularly in connection with on-going related patent litigation. He also helps clients evaluate patent portfolios and implement effective patent strategies that maximize the value of those portfolios.
Frank has experience handling patent litigation matters across a wide array of technologies, including in areas of digital audio signal processing, digital imaging systems, optical imaging systems, digital communications and networking systems, graphics processing hardware and software, dental software, and semiconductor design and fabrication.
Frank also has an active pro bono practice. He has worked with the Middlesex County District Attorney’s Office Domestic Violence Pro Bono Attorney Program representing victims through the civil restraining order process. Frank also serves as a volunteer attorney with the Boston Bar Association’s Criminal Offender Record Information (CORI) sealing project, which helps low-income clients who have questions about their criminal records.
Firm News
11.22.23
Boston Magazine Recognizes 10 Troutman Pepper Attorneys as Top Lawyers
Firm Events
09.29.22
When the CEO Calls – Part II
Podcasts
08.08.22
EV Tech Series: IP Enforcement at the ITC and Federal Courts
Articles + Publications
07.21.22
Strategic Considerations for ITC Investigations Given USPTO's New Guidance on IPR/PGR Discretionary Denial
Firm News
05.10.22
Troutman Pepper Notches Federal Circuit Win for Andrea Electronics Corporation
Articles + Publications
03.02.22
Federal Circuit Clarifies Scope of IPR Estoppel