Scott handles all aspects of patent prosecution and litigation matters. His comprehensive understanding of complex technologies, coupled with a strategic approach to both prosecution and litigation, make him an asset for businesses navigating the intricacies of patent law.

Overview
Representative Matters
Insights
Awards

Scott focuses his practice on patent prosecution, litigation, and licensing, particularly in the realms of mechanical and medical devices, aerospace, and systems. His patent prosecution work includes preparing applications for a diverse array of technologies, such as surgical devices and robotic surgical systems, gas turbine engines and fuel control systems, and consumer packaging and paperboard manufacturing.

Scott’s litigation experience spans district courts nationwide, handling cases involving surgical insufflation systems, fluid filtration devices, fuel control systems, automotive superchargers, and network monitoring systems. He also represents clients in inter partes review proceedings conducted before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

  • MeadWestvaco Corp. v. Rexam Beauty & Closures, Inc., 731 F.3d 1258 (Fed. Cir. 2013) Represented plaintiff in a case involving patents for polymer tubes used in perfume bottles.
  • Wellman, Inc. v. Eastman Chemical Co., 642 F.3d 1355 (Fed. Cir. 2011) Represented plaintiff in a case involving patents on polymers used in the manufacture of water bottles.
  • Northgate Technologies, Inc. v. Stryker Corporation et al., Case No.: 1-12-cv-7032 (N.D. Ill.) Represented the defendant in a case involving patented insufflators used in laparoscopic surgery.
  • 911 Notify LLC v. Integrity Tracking LLC, Case No. 1:14-cv-01150 (D. Del.) Represented the defendant in a case involving a patent for mobile medical alert systems.
  • Packet Intelligence LLC v. NetScout Systems, Inc. et al., Case No. 2:16-cv-00230 (E.D. Tex.) Represented the defendants in a case involving patents on systems for monitoring traffic in a data network.
  • Techshell v. Max Interactive Inc., Case No. 8:19-cv-00608 (C.D. Cal.) Represented the defendant in a case involving patents for protective cases for laptop computers.
  • Edelbrock, LLC v. Whipple Industries, Inc., Case No. 1:19-cv-01502 (E.D. Cal.) Representing the defendant in a case involving dual pass intercooled superchargers for automotive engines.
  • The Best Lawyers in America®, Litigation – Patent (2018-2026), Patent Law (2023-2026)
  • Fellow, Litigation Counsel of America

Scott focuses his practice on patent prosecution, litigation, and licensing, particularly in the realms of mechanical and medical devices, aerospace, and systems. His patent prosecution work includes preparing applications for a diverse array of technologies, such as surgical devices and robotic surgical systems, gas turbine engines and fuel control systems, and consumer packaging and paperboard manufacturing.

Scott’s litigation experience spans district courts nationwide, handling cases involving surgical insufflation systems, fluid filtration devices, fuel control systems, automotive superchargers, and network monitoring systems. He also represents clients in inter partes review proceedings conducted before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.

  • MeadWestvaco Corp. v. Rexam Beauty & Closures, Inc., 731 F.3d 1258 (Fed. Cir. 2013) Represented plaintiff in a case involving patents for polymer tubes used in perfume bottles.
  • Wellman, Inc. v. Eastman Chemical Co., 642 F.3d 1355 (Fed. Cir. 2011) Represented plaintiff in a case involving patents on polymers used in the manufacture of water bottles.
  • Northgate Technologies, Inc. v. Stryker Corporation et al., Case No.: 1-12-cv-7032 (N.D. Ill.) Represented the defendant in a case involving patented insufflators used in laparoscopic surgery.
  • 911 Notify LLC v. Integrity Tracking LLC, Case No. 1:14-cv-01150 (D. Del.) Represented the defendant in a case involving a patent for mobile medical alert systems.
  • Packet Intelligence LLC v. NetScout Systems, Inc. et al., Case No. 2:16-cv-00230 (E.D. Tex.) Represented the defendants in a case involving patents on systems for monitoring traffic in a data network.
  • Techshell v. Max Interactive Inc., Case No. 8:19-cv-00608 (C.D. Cal.) Represented the defendant in a case involving patents for protective cases for laptop computers.
  • Edelbrock, LLC v. Whipple Industries, Inc., Case No. 1:19-cv-01502 (E.D. Cal.) Representing the defendant in a case involving dual pass intercooled superchargers for automotive engines.
  • The Best Lawyers in America®, Litigation – Patent (2018-2026), Patent Law (2023-2026)
  • Fellow, Litigation Counsel of America
  • Member, American Society of Mechanical Engineers
  • Member, Federal Circuit Bar Association
  • Member, Connecticut Intellectual Property Law Association

Education

  • New York Law School, J.D., 1992
  • George Washington University, School of Engineering and Applied Science, B.S.M.E., 1989

Bar Admissions

  • Connecticut
  • New York
  • U.S. Patent and Trademark Office

Court Admissions

  • Supreme Court of the United States
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit
  • U.S. District Court, District of Connecticut
  • U.S. District Court, Eastern District of New York
  • U.S. District Court, Southern District of New York