Misha is a leading appellate attorney with an accomplished track record before the U.S. Supreme Court, federal courts of appeal, and state courts. He is a nationally recognized authority on administrative law and political law issues.

Overview
Representative Matters
Insights
Awards

Misha leads the firm’s Appellate + Supreme Court Practice Group. He is nationally known for his work in high-profile cases in the fields of administrative law and political law. Misha has argued and won multiple cases in appellate courts throughout the U.S., from the U.S. Supreme Court and federal courts of appeals to state supreme courts and state appellate courts. Misha argued and prevailed before the U.S. Supreme Court in Gill v. Whitford, the most significant redistricting case in decades, in Murr v. Wisconsin, a high-stakes regulatory takings case, and in Rudisill v. McDonough, a major veterans benefits case. He also obtained numerous favorable emergency orders from the U.S. Supreme Court, including in administrative law, political law, and First Amendment issues.

Clients in regulated industries value Misha’s meticulous approach to bet-the-company challenges, including in the highest-stakes cases under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). Misha has led and won many of the most important APA cases in the U.S. over the last decade, including lawsuits against rules and rulings issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).

Misha is also a recognized leader in political law, including redistricting and election-related litigation. He represents clients ranging from ordinary citizens to independent redistricting commissioners and state legislatures and is responsible for multiple landmark victories in state, federal appellate, and U.S. Supreme Court cases. Most recently, he secured a significant victory at the New York Court of Appeals, invaliding both the congressional and state senate maps as unconstitutional under New York’s newly enacted anti-gerrymandering amendments.

  • Successfully challenged the New York Legislature’s partisan gerrymandered congressional and State Senate maps, winning at all three levels of the New York Court system, including in expedited proceedings before the New York Court of Appeals, resulting in the drawing of new maps by an independent, nonpartisan special master.
  • Successfully defended the nonpartisan Colorado Independent Congressional Redistricting Commission’s final congressional map against multiple novel challenges in the Colorado Supreme Court, which issued a landmark, unanimous opinion adopting the map.
  • Briefed and argued Rudisill v. McDonough, a case challenging the VA’s interpretation of the Post-9/11 GI Bill, before the U.S. Supreme Court. He obtained a 7-2 victory on behalf of his client, ensuring more than a million veterans would be eligible for educational benefits previously denied by the VA.
  • Successfully represented industry group before the U.S. Supreme Court in West Virginia v. EPA, No.20-1530 (U.S.), a landmark administrative-law case under the major-questions doctrine.
  • Obtained a nationwide stay from the U.S. Supreme Court pending appeal of a district court’s order vacating a rule pertained to licensing requirements for, among other things, hydropower electric generating systems. This nationwide stay allowed the industry-favored Section 401 Rule to remain in effect, before a successful challenge to the district court’s determination on the merits in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
  • Achieved multiple appellate victories on behalf of energy-sector clients before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
  • Representing New York counties, towns, and individuals in the first lawsuits filed under the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York, a state law governing redistricting and voting rules.
  • Successfully defended Wisconsin state election laws before the U.S. Supreme Court (at the emergency-stay stage), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, and the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
  • Successfully defended various Wisconsin state laws and government actions against multiple novel constitutional challenges, resulting in landmark separation-of-powers opinions from the Wisconsin Supreme Court and published opinions from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
  • Successfully challenged burdensome restrictions imposed by state and local laws on religious exercise before the U.S. Supreme Court (at the emergency-stay stage) and the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
  • Successfully defended a drug manufacturer against securities-fraud claims before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
  • Briefed and argued Gill v. Whitford, a major redistricting case, before the U.S. Supreme Court. He obtained a 9-0 victory on behalf of his client, on his lead argument.
  • Briefed and argued Murr v. Wisconsin, a significant regulatory takings case, before the U.S. Supreme Court. He obtained a 5-3 victory on behalf of his client.
  • Led the multistate, multicourt coalition against the WOTUS Rule, issued under the Clean Water Act. He obtained a stay and preliminary injunction against the rule from the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, as well as from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia.
  • Argued numerous cases before the federal courts of appeals, including several high-profile environmental law and election law challenges.
  • Successfully challenged the federal COVID-19 vaccine mandate on federal contractors, obtaining a preliminary injunction in the district court against the mandate and then securing an affirmance of that injunction before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
  • Briefed and argued Tetra Tech v. DOR, a leading administrative law case that ended agency deference in Wisconsin. He developed a new theory before the Wisconsin Supreme Court, which that court adopted in its landmark opinion.
  • Benchmark Litigation: “Future Litigation Star” in Illinois (2025)
  • Crain’s Chicago Business’ Notable Leaders in Accounting, Consulting & Law (2024)
  • Chambers USA: Litigation: General Commercial, Illinois (2024) and Litigation: Appellate, Illinois (2025)
  • City & State New York: Law Power 100 (2023)
  • Honors, Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll, D.C. Access to Justice Commission and the D.C. Bar Pro Bono Center (2024)
  • Best Brief Award from the National Association of Attorneys General for merits brief in Gill v. Whitford

Misha leads the firm’s Appellate + Supreme Court Practice Group. He is nationally known for his work in high-profile cases in the fields of administrative law and political law. Misha has argued and won multiple cases in appellate courts throughout the U.S., from the U.S. Supreme Court and federal courts of appeals to state supreme courts and state appellate courts. Misha argued and prevailed before the U.S. Supreme Court in Gill v. Whitford, the most significant redistricting case in decades, in Murr v. Wisconsin, a high-stakes regulatory takings case, and in Rudisill v. McDonough, a major veterans benefits case. He also obtained numerous favorable emergency orders from the U.S. Supreme Court, including in administrative law, political law, and First Amendment issues.

Clients in regulated industries value Misha’s meticulous approach to bet-the-company challenges, including in the highest-stakes cases under the Administrative Procedure Act (APA). Misha has led and won many of the most important APA cases in the U.S. over the last decade, including lawsuits against rules and rulings issued by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC), the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).

Misha is also a recognized leader in political law, including redistricting and election-related litigation. He represents clients ranging from ordinary citizens to independent redistricting commissioners and state legislatures and is responsible for multiple landmark victories in state, federal appellate, and U.S. Supreme Court cases. Most recently, he secured a significant victory at the New York Court of Appeals, invaliding both the congressional and state senate maps as unconstitutional under New York’s newly enacted anti-gerrymandering amendments.

  • Successfully challenged the New York Legislature’s partisan gerrymandered congressional and State Senate maps, winning at all three levels of the New York Court system, including in expedited proceedings before the New York Court of Appeals, resulting in the drawing of new maps by an independent, nonpartisan special master.
  • Successfully defended the nonpartisan Colorado Independent Congressional Redistricting Commission’s final congressional map against multiple novel challenges in the Colorado Supreme Court, which issued a landmark, unanimous opinion adopting the map.
  • Briefed and argued Rudisill v. McDonough, a case challenging the VA’s interpretation of the Post-9/11 GI Bill, before the U.S. Supreme Court. He obtained a 7-2 victory on behalf of his client, ensuring more than a million veterans would be eligible for educational benefits previously denied by the VA.
  • Successfully represented industry group before the U.S. Supreme Court in West Virginia v. EPA, No.20-1530 (U.S.), a landmark administrative-law case under the major-questions doctrine.
  • Obtained a nationwide stay from the U.S. Supreme Court pending appeal of a district court’s order vacating a rule pertained to licensing requirements for, among other things, hydropower electric generating systems. This nationwide stay allowed the industry-favored Section 401 Rule to remain in effect, before a successful challenge to the district court’s determination on the merits in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
  • Achieved multiple appellate victories on behalf of energy-sector clients before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.
  • Representing New York counties, towns, and individuals in the first lawsuits filed under the John R. Lewis Voting Rights Act of New York, a state law governing redistricting and voting rules.
  • Successfully defended Wisconsin state election laws before the U.S. Supreme Court (at the emergency-stay stage), the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit, and the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
  • Successfully defended various Wisconsin state laws and government actions against multiple novel constitutional challenges, resulting in landmark separation-of-powers opinions from the Wisconsin Supreme Court and published opinions from the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
  • Successfully challenged burdensome restrictions imposed by state and local laws on religious exercise before the U.S. Supreme Court (at the emergency-stay stage) and the Wisconsin Supreme Court.
  • Successfully defended a drug manufacturer against securities-fraud claims before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit.
  • Briefed and argued Gill v. Whitford, a major redistricting case, before the U.S. Supreme Court. He obtained a 9-0 victory on behalf of his client, on his lead argument.
  • Briefed and argued Murr v. Wisconsin, a significant regulatory takings case, before the U.S. Supreme Court. He obtained a 5-3 victory on behalf of his client.
  • Led the multistate, multicourt coalition against the WOTUS Rule, issued under the Clean Water Act. He obtained a stay and preliminary injunction against the rule from the Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, as well as from the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Georgia.
  • Argued numerous cases before the federal courts of appeals, including several high-profile environmental law and election law challenges.
  • Successfully challenged the federal COVID-19 vaccine mandate on federal contractors, obtaining a preliminary injunction in the district court against the mandate and then securing an affirmance of that injunction before the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit.
  • Briefed and argued Tetra Tech v. DOR, a leading administrative law case that ended agency deference in Wisconsin. He developed a new theory before the Wisconsin Supreme Court, which that court adopted in its landmark opinion.
  • Benchmark Litigation: “Future Litigation Star” in Illinois (2025)
  • Crain’s Chicago Business’ Notable Leaders in Accounting, Consulting & Law (2024)
  • Chambers USA: Litigation: General Commercial, Illinois (2024) and Litigation: Appellate, Illinois (2025)
  • City & State New York: Law Power 100 (2023)
  • Honors, Capital Pro Bono Honor Roll, D.C. Access to Justice Commission and the D.C. Bar Pro Bono Center (2024)
  • Best Brief Award from the National Association of Attorneys General for merits brief in Gill v. Whitford
  • Solicitor general of Wisconsin, 2015-2018
  • Deputy attorney general and general counsel, Office of the West Virginia Attorney General, 2014-2015

Education

  • Georgetown University Law Center, J.D., summa cum laude, 2006
  • Amherst College, B.A., magna cum laude, 2003

Bar Admissions

  • District of Columbia
  • Illinois
  • New York
  • Wisconsin
  • West Virginia (Inactive)

Court Admissions

  • Supreme Court of the United States
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, First Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit
  • U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit
  • U.S. District Court, Northern District of Alabama
  • U.S. District Court, District of Columbia
  • U.S. District Court, Northern District of Illinois
  • U.S. District Court, Southern District of West Virginia
  • U.S. District Court, Eastern District of Wisconsin
  • U.S. District Court, Western District of Wisconsin

Clerkships

  • Hon. Anthony M. Kennedy, Supreme Court of the United States, 2009-2010
  • Hon. Janice Rogers Brown, U.S. Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit, 2007-2008
  • Hon. Alex Kozinski, U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit, 2007
  • Speaker, “Courthouse Steps Oral Argument: Food and Drug Administration v. Wages and White Lion Investments, LLC, ” The Federalist Society, Webinar, December 3, 2024.
  • Speaker, “Supreme Court Round Up,” The Federalist Society – Chicago Student Chapter, October 25, 2024.
  • Speaker, “October 2024 Supreme Court Term Preview, ” The Federalist Society – Northwestern Student Chapter, October 17, 2024.
  • Speaker, “U.S. Supreme Court Term in Review, ” The Federalist Society – Michigan Lawyers Chapter, June 18, 2024.
  • Speaker, “The Supreme Court and Loper and Chevron,” The Federalist Society – Hawaii Student Chapter, February 26, 2024.
  • Speaker, “What Is on the Supreme Court’s Docket?” The Federalist Society – Illinois Student Chapter, February 13, 2024.
  • Speaker, TPPPA 2023 Solving the Payments Puzzle Conference, September 12-14, 2023.
  • Speaker, “United States Supreme Court Update and Review 2022-2023 Term,” Associate of Corporate Counsel, Georgia CLE, February 2023.
  • Speaker, “United States Supreme Court Update and Review 2022-2023 Term,” Troutman Pepper CLE, January 2023.
  • Speaker, “U.S. Supreme Court Update and Review,” Troutman Pepper, June 30, 2021.
  • Speaker, “Duguid v. Facebook: Supreme Court Answers the Call on the TCPA,” Troutman Pepper, April 7, 2021.
  • Speaker, Federalist Society Chapter of the Federalist Society at Washington University in St. Louis, November 6, 2019.
  • Speaker, “Misha Tseytlin Lunch Talk,” Harvard Law School – Harvard Federalist Society, October 16, 2019.
  • Speaker, “Court in Transition,” American Bar Association – 2019 ABA Annual Meeting, August 9, 2019.
  • Panel, “Sea Change in Administrative Agency Review: A Discussion on the Wisconsin Supreme Court’s Tetra Tech Decision,” Year in Review: Hot Topics for Government Lawyers Seminar, State Bar of Wisconsin, April 24, 2019.
  • Speaker, “The Law and Policy of Redistricting Reform,” The Federalist Society – 2019 Ohio Lawyers Chapters Conference, April 5, 2019.
  • Speaker, “The Extraordinary Session,” American Constitution Society – University of Wisconsin Law School, April 1, 2019.
  • Speaker, “Executive Oversight and Separation of Powers: The Potential for Change in Kisor v. Wilkie,” The Federalist Society – Wisconsin Student Chapter, March 28, 2019.
  • Speaker, “DOJ: The Mighty Agency No One Knows About,” The Federalist Society – Milwaukee Lawyers Chapter, March 20, 2019.
  • Speaker, “Seminar on the State of Wisconsin’s Administrative State,” The Federalist Society – Madison Lawyers Chapter, March 19, 2019.
  • Panels regarding Tetra Tech v. DOR – Marquette Law School; Wisconsin DNR CLE; October – November 2018.
  • Panel regarding Justice Kennedy – Phoenix Federalist Society; October 22, 2018.
  • Speeches and keynote engagement regarding Solicitor General’s Office – Madison Federalist Society; Milwaukee Federalist Society; Wisconsin Manufacturers and Commerce; Madison Inn of Court; American Bar Association; April 2016 – September 2018.
  • Panel regarding administrative law – University of Wisconsin Law School; American Bar Association; April 2017 – August 2018.
  • Television appearance – CBS; July 9, 2018.
  • Television appearance – CNN; June 30, 2018.
  • Television appearance – Fox News; June 30, 2018.
  • Television appearance – Fox Business; June 29, 2018.
  • Television appearance – CNN; June 27, 2018.
  • Panels and speech regarding Gill v. Whitford – Georgetown University Law Center; University of Wisconsin Law School; Madison Federalist Society; Federalist Society; October 2017 – June 2018.
  • Panel regarding appellate advocacy – Harvard Law School; April 2, 2018.
  • Teleforum regarding redistricting – Federalist Society; March 30, 2018.
  • Teleforum regarding Affordable Care Act litigation – Federalist Society; March 14, 2018.
  • Teleforum regarding Artis v. D.C. – Federalist Society; November 27, 2017.
  • Panels regarding Wisconsin Supreme Court, Milwaukee Federalist Society, University of Wisconsin; October – November 2017.
  • Panels and teleforum regarding Murr v. Wisconsin – Federalist Society; University of Wisconsin Law School; March – October 2017.
  • Panels regarding Supreme Court – Fayetteville Federalist Society; Iowa Federalist Society; University of Arkansas Law School; February 2016 – August 2017.
  • Testimony regarding WOTUS Rule, Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, April 26, 2017.
  • Panels and speeches regarding Clean Power Plan – Federalist Society; Energy and Mineral Law Foundation; Wisconsin Energy Providers Conference; National Association of Attorneys General; American Bar Association; June 2015 – April 2017.
  • Panels and speeches regarding North Carolina State Board v. FTC – Heritage Foundation; American Bar Association; Federation of Associations of Regulatory Boards; April 2015 – September 2016.
  • Testimony regarding North Carolina State Board v. FTC, Senate Subcommittee on Antitrust, Competition Policy and Consumer Rights, February 2, 2016.